I have held a constant amount (in Troy ounces) of gold for the past 11 years. From the late 90's until 2005-06 I held some of the larger gold miners and BGEIX (American Century Gold) and VGPMX (Vanguard Precious Metals and Mining). With the increase in general market volatility in 2007 I consciously reduced my gold stock exposure to a smaller holding and traded a bit on intermediate term (months) swings. I've done that also with some of the "paper" bullion ETF's and closed ends: CEF, PHYS, GTU.
Since the gold fund highs of early 2008, most funds have gone "nowhere but in an interesting manner" as John Hussman often describes volatile sideways market action. That has begun to change this year, and I think gold stocks are finally starting a catch-up move and will break out to new highs.
We know that gold bullion has quintupled in price since 1999 while stock indices have gone nowhere. A recent study has shown that gold has outperformed stocks since the US stopped redeeming dollars for gold in 1971. A real shocker, however, was Mark Lundeen's email this weekend. With some assistance by an Australian reader, Lundeen was able to extend the Barron's gold stock index back to 1920 with complete data for Homestake Mining. Since 1920 Lundeen's indexed Homestake/Dow Jones list has increased from 1 to 135, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average has increased from 1 to 96 in the same 90 years! Lundeen's work is generally published at Gold-Eagle with a delay of a few days. Check back there later to see his chart from 1920. http://www.gold-eagle.com/gold_digest.html
The major factors driving gold are: 1. nearly continuous devaluation of the major sovereign currencies which has been on-going since World War I (and the FED) began. 2. an 11 year bear market in stocks which are normally a competitor of gold for inflation/devaluation protection. 3. a recent (2006 to present) bear market in investment real estate, and 4. rapidly maturing long bull market in bonds (bear market in interest rates). It has become extremely difficult for professionals and individual investors to make any money in the big three of stock equities, real estate, and bonds. Nor are there any obvious stand-out currencies above the crowd for long term investment.
Thus gold is becoming almost the only game left with a strong trend in motion, and gold is really quite a small market, even including gold mining shares. This is why investment demand for gold has picked up in the past two years. So far it is only a trickle as so few investors at any level of size have any significant gold position. On supply/demand grounds alone gold's price could increase in a major way.
I began buying ASA Ltd (ASA) http://www.asaltd.com/about/company.asp, an "ancient" closed-end gold fund, in June. Originally, in the 1950's, ASA held only legacy South African mines which paid very large dividends. It was always listed in the US. With th passage of time and due to international politics and gradual depletion of the South African gold deposits, these huge holdings were diversified internationally. The fund re-incorporated from South Africa to Bermuda and moved its operating headquarters to the US. As of May it has only 22% left in South African miners while 40% is in Canada.
Funds are my preference rather than individual equities. It's hard enough to try to get the market and its potential right without trying to beat full time professionals at stock picking. Out of a universe of about 25 funds with at ;east a decade of operating history, I picked six with stable management and decent annualized returns. Since Tocqueville Gold (TGLDX) has been a winner but only started up in 1998, I measured the six from the date of TGLDX's start-up. July 7, 1998 is a good date since it was almost at the end of the long bear market.
MS is data from Morningstar's on-line total return charts and FT is from FastTrak's charts. The two companies roughly agree except for ASA, and I suspect Morningstar is more nearly correct. Annualized total returns depend on the date of reinvested dividends aa well as the amounts and on splits or reverse splits. I have a query in for both sources, but who knows when I will hear from them.
USAGX is USAA's Gold fund, VGPMX is Vanguard's Mining Fund, BGEIX is American Century's Gold Fund and CEF is the Canadian 50:50 gold:silver closed-end fund. I chose TGLDX. USAGX, VGPMX, and ASA for further review. I looked at the top 25 holdings of each of the four and tallied how many of the four held each mining company. The only stock held by all four funds was Newmont Mining. I was mainly interested in funds which had a lot of unique holdings. ASA has 3 unique holdings, USAGX has 4, and TGLDX has 5. But VGPMX has 16 unique holdings, so it deserves to be bought and perhaps weighted more heavily than the others. VGPMX does hold a lot of multi--mineral and even even some non-gold miners. As I learned from the late Paul Sarnoff in the 80's and 90's it's important to hold some non golds even in a gold portfolio.
I do have a small position in VGPMX from months back but will add to that and buy TGLDX. ASA habitually trades at 7-10% discount to its own neat asset value. But they are buying back shares at 98% of NAV each quarter under certain conditions, so that is always an out. Although I have very mixed feelings about the Canadian closed end bullion funds, I will probably buy some CEF for diversification. TGLDX and ASA do own some small percentages of gold and platinum bullion as well.
Bullion is about 15% of total investment portfolio now, and I plan to get up 25-30% with the gold funds added. I could even go higher if conditions warrant it. I'll be selling more of the longer term bond funds to do this. The argument that gold pays no interest is now moot as cash and even two year bonds pay no interest either.
Following are the top 25 holdings for TGLDX, VGPMX, and ASA (only 22 stocks held) respectively as on the date of their last reports:
Addendum 9/13/2010: Mark Lundeen has given permission to post his Barron's Gold Mining Index extension back from 1938 to 1920 using complete Homestake Mining price data. If you would like to receive Lundeen's weekly email (in .doc format and usually >20 pages) contact:
Mark J. Lundeen
[email protected]
Recent Comments