In this century two large economic forces have collided like geologic tectonic plates. The first is the longer term (2-3 decade) inflationary trend with lows set in place from 1998-2001. The second, currency debasement, implemented by artificially low interest rates used to "solve" a variety of debt crises around the world ever since 1997-98, reinforces inflation. So we have inflation heating up even as cooler deflationary recessions occur. This setting is very similar to the economic long wave transitional periods of the 1890's and 1940's.
Thus whatever the central banks and national governments do to ameliorate the debt and deflation issues (primarily by setting rates too low) the effect is an increase in prices by debasing the currency. Neither institutional nor private investors can make an "honest dollar" when rates are suppressed and currencies debased. So short term speculation and market volatility rule. Kiss stable growth good bye.
The capital of operating companies is also eroded and real balance sheets become tattered by taxes on phantom profits and inadequate depreciation. So even minor slowdowns result in multiple bankruptcies and accelerating unemployment. As state unemployment insurance rates increase for all employers due to increasing unemployment claims, and various taxes increase to fund expanding nationwide "safety net" programs, companies look to foreign sites for refuge. And so the economic death spiral descends further even as prices accelerate up. (See my comment on Fekete's work below.)
Keynesians don't know real economics and theoretically don't need to since they already have at hand all the answers to every problem. So no one in an "official" position (or academia) learns from their mistakes nor can even see them. The markets therefore do what markets always do in response and are reinforced in volatility by stimulus and failure followed by more stimulus. On top of this we now have a quasi-Marxist government (administration) rolling out more wealth re-distribution and unfunded benefit plans and ignorant regulation/ownership of ever more market sectors. They are very reminiscent of the Brezhnev orthodox party's last ditch attempt to save the rotting Soviet Union before the cracks in the edifice became too large and numerous to ignore. Bad times are coming,,,but Andrew Mellon would disagree on their being bad times. So would Schumpeter. Both were advocates of allowing, even encouraging, the rotten debt and policy to liquidate itself.
We don't know when this will happen, but we many are now aware of sovereign debt default issues. Once this awareness is widespread, we can expect a replay of the serial currency attacks that played out in the early 1930's in Europe as country after country was forced by speculators to devalue and go off gold. Of course gold isn't an official issue now as no one is "on" it, but gold will still be the primary beneficiary.
On a more practical level, we may be coming closer to the end of the "Big Bounce" out of the grossly oversold all-asset market bottoms of November 2008 and the March 2009 re-test of November 2008. It's not clear that this past 15-18 months has been anything other than an oversold rally. Nor is it clear that so-called retail level stimuli have played a lasting role other than modestly tempering the pain of average citizens in the US and elsewhere. ECRI reportedly predicted this past week that recession is not expected this year but that a slowdown is coming in the second half and that recurrent recessions may be expected in the new decade.
We don't trade on these longer term and shorter term economic fundamentals, but we do "invest" with them in mind. It's possible, and I hope, the markets will repeat the benign 2004 to 2007 recovery experience, but it's also possible they will not. Hussman Funds' Bill Hester describes how stock valuations are now out of line with recent inflation volatility, namely P/E's are historically too high. Look especially at his chart titled "Economic Uncertainty and Valuation" and the red dots representing the last six months of data.
At my lowly portfolio level I have some excellent capital gains in a variety of high yield instruments (closed-ends, open end bond funds, MLP's, preferreds, etc. as detailed in the recent portfolio update), and some are beginning to sell at premiums to NAV and sport dropping yields at market prices. For a lot of reasons many of these instruments trade as equities do. It's prudent to sell some of these with outsized gains whether at a premium or not. The same is true of some of the equity funds like FPACX, OAKBX and the Vanguard special sectors funds (health, energy, mining).
Although market technicians I respect, like James Stack and Terry Laundry, see no internal market deterioration yet and expect further stock market gains this year, my own sentiment and volume studies are getting to the edge of frothiness again, as in January. None of this means we must make an intermediate or longer term top now or even this year, but the longer term fundamentals are looming. But should one sell off a lot of this exposure to cash and near cash again as in 2007 and/or hedge the rest? And what would be the better short to intermediate term hedge? US Treasury's again as in 2008 or gold. I have some of each but much more in gold right now. Learned opinions vary on whether we'll first see a return of deflation fear or go right into currency devaluations and higher inflation IF a stock market downturn is coming. Preferably (to me) we'd see Treasury's zoom first and gold come off to 600-900 where I would double or triple up.
In any event I have only about 3.5% in cash now, and that's far too low after the good gains of the past15 months. So if the 2CS continues to drop (at 79 as of Friday), I plan to start peeling out of some holdings and looking to hedge.
Recent Comments