The Low Volatility fund category consists of HSGFX, VWIAX/VWINX, DODBX, FAIRX, and SGENX with the first two being 2/3 of the category total and the last three totaling 1/3. What I have done recently is to separate out from the low volatility portfolio the portion of DODBX and VWIAX/VWINX which consists of bonds and add that portion to the bond category which also contains VWALX, HSTRX, and PSAFX.
The High Volatility Niche category of stock funds contains nearly equal amounts of VGHCX (health), VGSIX (REITS), VGENX (energy), VGPMX (metals), and TAVFX (deep value). VSTCX (small caps) was sold because of increasing evidence that small caps are over-valued and will be more vulnerable relatively than they have been since 1999.
I have three funds to hedge some of the inherently (HSGFX) unhedged risk: BEARX (short + gold), RYVNX (200% short small caps), and RYTPX (200% short SP 500 index).
I had also held long term, paid-for (unleveraged) gold outside this portfolio but have decided to include it with the hedge category. Gold is not always a good hedge but it usually (but not in May/June 2006) does not correlate highly with the other categories.
Then I have money market cash.
Only very minor changes were made in the total holdings. But when I make these reasonable changes from one category to another to more accurately reflect what the holdings really are doing for the portfolio, I come up with these percentages:
1. Core low volatility ex-bonds 32.8%
2. High Volatility niche funds 10.9%
3. Bonds + bond part of Core 25.1%
4. Hedges + gold 18.6%
5. Money Market cash 12.6%
Total 100.0%
I could get even more accurate by subtracting fully-hedged HSGFX from the Core, and I could remove VGENX, VGSIX, and VGPMX from Niche and add to the Hedge + Gold category. Also I could explain that RYTPX and RYVNX are 200% short which also increases the Hedge + Gold category's effectiveness.
The real point, however, was to convince myself, and hopefully you, that I have created a true fairly simple, low volatility, low cost hedge fund containing a lot of usually non-correlated liquid funds.
>
A legitimate question to ask is what do you get by hedging everything? Although the fund was not fully in effect at Janaury 1, 2006, it has been evolving for three years. It is up 5% on the year and up 40% since September 1, 2003. The concept is to be long with quality stock and bond pickers and short the average indexes; to hold some cash; and to hold categories which are usually uncorrelated. Long the good and short the bad or just the average was the original concept of a hedge fund. Volatility is reduced, as it was for me in May and June. Vanguard's Prime Money Market Fund is up 2.74% so far this year while I am up 5%. But using the same principles I am up 12.6% compounded annually since September 1, 2003 when I first adopted this approach (although not the complete current lineup). For someone approaching or already in retirement this is not a bad result.
Please see the Low Volatility post of July and others related to it for more details on the individual funds and some studies done on this approach. With limited funds or limited desire to spend time on it, one could probably do nearly as well using only HSGFX 60%, HSTRX 20%, and a decent money market fund 20%.
Recent Comments